A2 Refereed review article in a scientific journal
A systematic review of the efficacy of live attenuated influenza vaccine upon revaccination of children
Authors: Caspard H, Heikkinen T, Belshe RB, Ambrose CS
Publisher: TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
Publishing place: PHILADELPHIA, PA
Publication year: 2016
Journal: Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics
Journal name in source: HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS
Journal acronym: HUM VACC IMMUNOTHER
Volume: 12
Issue: 7
First page : 1721
Last page: 1727
Number of pages: 7
ISSN: 2164-5515
eISSN: 2164-554X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2015.1115164
Abstract
Four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in 6090 children that investigated the efficacy of live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) upon revaccination of children against laboratory-confirmed cases of influenza in consecutive seasons were reviewed.The efficacy in season 2 of LAIV administered over 2 consecutive seasons was 86.7% (95 % CI: 76.8%, 92.4%) against strains antigenically similar to those contained in the vaccine. The additional efficacy of LAIV administered in season 2 compared to LAIV recipients in season 1 only was 58.4% (28.3%, 75.9%). LAIV administered over 2 consecutive seasons also was more efficacious than was LAIV administered in season 2 only (relative efficacy: 53.9% [17.4%, 74.3%]). Residual efficacy of LAIV administered in season 1 only compared to placebo administered in two consecutive seasons was 56.4% (37.0%, 69.8%). This review did not find any evidence of decreasing efficacy of LAIV when administered during 2 consecutive seasons.
Four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in 6090 children that investigated the efficacy of live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) upon revaccination of children against laboratory-confirmed cases of influenza in consecutive seasons were reviewed.The efficacy in season 2 of LAIV administered over 2 consecutive seasons was 86.7% (95 % CI: 76.8%, 92.4%) against strains antigenically similar to those contained in the vaccine. The additional efficacy of LAIV administered in season 2 compared to LAIV recipients in season 1 only was 58.4% (28.3%, 75.9%). LAIV administered over 2 consecutive seasons also was more efficacious than was LAIV administered in season 2 only (relative efficacy: 53.9% [17.4%, 74.3%]). Residual efficacy of LAIV administered in season 1 only compared to placebo administered in two consecutive seasons was 56.4% (37.0%, 69.8%). This review did not find any evidence of decreasing efficacy of LAIV when administered during 2 consecutive seasons.
UTU Research Portal