Photopolymerization of Light Curing Adhesives Used with Metal Orthodontic Brackets and Matrices




Kilponen L, Uusitalo E, Tolvanen M, Varrela J, Vallittu PK

PublisherAMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS

2016

Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering

JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS AND TISSUE ENGINEERING

J BIOMATER TISS ENG

6

8

659

664

6

2157-9083

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1166/jbt.2016.1483



Objective: To measure the degree of conversion (DC%) of light-curing orthodontic adhesives under both orthodontic brackets and metal matrices. In addition, the transmission of curing light through dentin slices of different thicknesses was evaluated. Methods: Two light-curing dimethacrylate adhesives (Transbond (TM) XT and Enlight) were each tested in 11 groups (n = 5/group): a control group (without a bracket), under a bracket, and under four different sized pieces of dental matrices shielding the resin from light curing. Additional groups contained a continuous E-glass-fiber weave in the adhesive interface. The adhesives were light-cured for 40 s and the DC% was measured with FT-IR. The transmission of curing light was measured through slices of dentin (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 mm). Results: Both bracket and metal matrices prevented the DC% of the adhesive from reaching the DC% of the control. Transbond (TM) showed lower DC% than Enlight. The DC% was higher with a piece of glass-fiber weave (p < 0.05). Dentin slices influenced transmission of curing light significantly with a decrease from 1845 mW/cm(2) to zero through dentine slice of 4.0 mm. Conclusions: The photopolymerization of light curing adhesives was influenced by the light shielding effect of both the metal brackets and the matrices. Dentine slices attenuated the curing light.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 17:47