A2 Vertaisarvioitu katsausartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Research on ethics in nursing care for older people: A literature review
Tekijät: Suhonen R, Stolt M, Launis V, Leino-Kilpi H
Kustantaja: SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
Julkaisuvuosi: 2010
Journal: Nursing Ethics
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: NURSING ETHICS
Lehden akronyymi: NURS ETHICS
Numero sarjassa: 3
Vuosikerta: 17
Numero: 3
Aloitussivu: 337
Lopetussivu: 352
Sivujen määrä: 16
ISSN: 0969-7330
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733010361445
Tiivistelmä
The aim of this review was to analyse the empirical studies that focus on ethics in nursing care for older people, scoping the need and areas for further study. A search of the MEDLINE and CINAHL databases (earliest to August 2009) was conducted using the the keywords: ethic* and nursing or care or caring and elderly or aged or older. After a four-stage process, 71 empirical articles were included in the review, with informants ranging from elderly people to relatives, caregivers, managers and students in care settings. The review focusses on the concepts, contexts, methods and validity of these studies. Based on the analysis, the reviewed research seems to be fragmented and multifaceted, focussing on selected issues such as autonomy, self-determination and informed consent. No large research programs or research traditions were found so it was not possible to draw any conclusions about suitable methods, study designs or instruments of measurement for use in this research area.
The aim of this review was to analyse the empirical studies that focus on ethics in nursing care for older people, scoping the need and areas for further study. A search of the MEDLINE and CINAHL databases (earliest to August 2009) was conducted using the the keywords: ethic* and nursing or care or caring and elderly or aged or older. After a four-stage process, 71 empirical articles were included in the review, with informants ranging from elderly people to relatives, caregivers, managers and students in care settings. The review focusses on the concepts, contexts, methods and validity of these studies. Based on the analysis, the reviewed research seems to be fragmented and multifaceted, focussing on selected issues such as autonomy, self-determination and informed consent. No large research programs or research traditions were found so it was not possible to draw any conclusions about suitable methods, study designs or instruments of measurement for use in this research area.