A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Mate choice for male and female size in aquatic isopod Idotea balthica
Tekijät: Jormalainen V, Tuomi J, Merilaita S
Kustantaja: FINNISH ZOOLOGICAL BOTANICAL PUBLISHING BOARD
Julkaisuvuosi: 1992
Journal: Annales Zoologici Fennici
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: ANNALES ZOOLOGICI FENNICI
Lehden akronyymi: ANN ZOOL FENN
Vuosikerta: 29
Numero: 3
Aloitussivu: 161
Lopetussivu: 167
Sivujen määrä: 7
ISSN: 0003-455X
eISSN: 1797-2450
Tiivistelmä
In laboratory tests the pair formation of the sexually size dimorphic and colour polymorphic isopod Idotea balthica was non-random with respect to size, whereas colouration had hardly any effect on mate choice. When given a choice of two females, 70% of the males selected the larger female for precopula. In experimental populations, however, female size had no evident effect on mate choice, so that further confounding effects may complicate the pair formation in natural heterogenous habitats. Precopulatory males were larger than solitary males in the experimental populations, both in female- and male-biased populations. The larger size of precopulatory males may at least partly result from male-male competition, but the females may also affect the precopulatory success of the males in a size-dependent manner. Consequently, presumably both intrasexual and intersexual interactions favour larger males in I. balthica. Female size, on the other hand, may be only a second choice after female maturity. The male-biased sex ratio in early summer may in particular discourage males from being too size selective.
In laboratory tests the pair formation of the sexually size dimorphic and colour polymorphic isopod Idotea balthica was non-random with respect to size, whereas colouration had hardly any effect on mate choice. When given a choice of two females, 70% of the males selected the larger female for precopula. In experimental populations, however, female size had no evident effect on mate choice, so that further confounding effects may complicate the pair formation in natural heterogenous habitats. Precopulatory males were larger than solitary males in the experimental populations, both in female- and male-biased populations. The larger size of precopulatory males may at least partly result from male-male competition, but the females may also affect the precopulatory success of the males in a size-dependent manner. Consequently, presumably both intrasexual and intersexual interactions favour larger males in I. balthica. Female size, on the other hand, may be only a second choice after female maturity. The male-biased sex ratio in early summer may in particular discourage males from being too size selective.
Turun yliopiston Tutkimustietojärjestelmän portaali