A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Cash‐for‐Care Use and Union Dissolution in Finland




TekijätMorosow Kathrin, Jalovaara Marika, Härkönen Juho

KustantajaWiley

Julkaisuvuosi2021

JournalJournal of Marriage and Family

Vuosikerta83

Numero1

Aloitussivu209

Lopetussivu227

Sivujen määrä19

ISSN0022-2445

eISSN1741-3737

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12738

Verkko-osoitehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jomf.12738

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/51259028


Tiivistelmä





Objective

This study examines how the receipt of the cash‐for‐care (CFC) benefit affects short‐ and long‐term risks of union dissolution.






Background

Several theories predict that couples' gendered
division of labor decreases their risk of separation, either due to
increased partnership satisfaction or because it establishes economic
dependency. Family policies such as the Finnish CFC benefit, which is
paid if a young child does not attend public daycare, may encourage such
a gendered division of labor, at least temporarily.






Method

Using Finnish register data, this study analyzes the
first childbearing unions of 38,093 couples between 1987 and 2009.
Discrete‐time event history analyses and fixed effects models for
nonrepeated events are applied.






Results

The results suggest a lower separation risk while the
benefit is received as compared to couples who do not use it, but no
effect in the long‐term. Fixed effects models that control for selection
into CFC indicate postponement of separation until after take‐up.
Higher‐income mothers show a stronger postponement effect, possibly due
to greater income following leave.






Conclusion

CFC use, which signals a temporary gendered division
of labor and losses in mothers' earnings, predicts a lower separation
risk during receipt of the benefit, but not beyond.






Implications

Policies that affect the division of paid and unpaid labor at best only temporarily reduce dissolution risks.





Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 17:18