Refereed journal article or data article (A1)

The influence of dexmedetomidine and propofol on circulating cytokine levels in healthy subjects




List of AuthorsKallioinen M, Scheinin A, Maksimow M, Långsjö J, Kaisti K, Takala R, Vahlberg T, Valli K, Salmi M, Scheinin H, Maksimow A

PublisherSpringer

Publication year2019

JournalBMC Anesthesiology

Journal name in sourceBMC anesthesiology

Journal acronymBMC Anesthesiol

Article number222

Volume number19

Issue number1

ISSN1471-2253

eISSN1471-2253

DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0895-3

URLhttps://bmcanesthesiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12871-019-0895-3

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/43904333


Abstract

Background:

Surgery and diseases modify inflammatory responses and the immune system. Anesthetic agents also have effects on the human immune system but the responses they induce may be altered or masked by the surgical procedures or underlying illnesses. The aim of this study was to assess how single-drug dexmedetomidine and propofol anesthesia without any surgical intervention alter acute immunological biomarkers in healthy subjects.

Methods:

Thirty-five healthy, young male subjects were anesthetized using increasing concentrations of dexmedetomidine (n = 18) or propofol (n = 17) until loss of responsiveness (LOR) was detected. The treatment allocation was randomized. Multi-parametric immunoassays for the detection of 48 cytokines, chemokines and growth factors were used. Concentrations were determined at baseline and at the highest drug concentration foreach subject.

Results:

The changes in the concentration of eotaxin (decrease after dexmedetomidine) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF, increase after propofol) were statistically significantly different between the groups. Significant changes were detected within both groups; the concentrations of monocyte chemotactic protein 1, chemokine ligand 27 and macrophage migration inhibitory factor were lower in both groups after the drug administration. Dexmedetomidine decreased the concentration of eotaxin, interleukin-18, interleukin-2Rα, stem cell factor, stem cell growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor, and propofol decreased significantly the levels of hepatocyte growth factor, IFN-γ-induced protein 10 and monokine induced by IFN-γ, and increased the levels of interleukin-17, interleukin-5, interleukin-7 and PDGF.

Conclusions:

Dexmedetomidine seemed to have an immunosuppressive effect on the immune system whereas propofol seemed to induce mixed pro- and anti-inflammatory effects on the immune system. The choice of anesthetic agent could be relevant when treating patients with compromised immunological defense mechanisms. Trial registration: Before subject enrollment, the study was registered in the European Clinical Trials database(EudraCT number 2013–001496-21, The Neural Mechanisms of Anesthesia and Human Consciousness) and in ClinicalTrials.gov (Principal Investigator: Harry Scheinin, number NCT01889004, The Neural Mechanisms of Anesthesia and Human Consciousness, Part 2, on the 23rd of June 2013).


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Last updated on 2022-07-04 at 17:34