Refereed article in compilation book (A3)

Enacting a National Reform Interval in Times of Uncertainty: Evaluation Gluttony Among the Willing




List of AuthorsJoakim Lindgren, Linda Rönnberg, Agneta Hult, Christina Segerholm

EditorsChristina Segerholm, Agneta Hult, Joakim Lindgren, Linda Rönnberg

Publication year2019

Book title *The Governing-Evaluation-Knowledge Nexus : Swedish Higher Education as a Case

Title of seriesEvaluating Education: Normative Systems and Institutional Practices

Start page119

End page138

ISBN978-3-030-21142-4

eISBN978-3-030-21143-1

ISSN2570-0251

DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21143-1_7

URLhttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-21143-1_7

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/42361041


Abstract

This chapter offers an empirical illustration of the
governing-evaluation-knowledge nexus by pinpointing a particular
situation, a pause between two national evaluation and quality assurance
(EQA) reforms, while a new national system was being planned and
prepared, but its final design was not yet decided upon. This
situation – unusual in the Swedish higher education policy context –
adds uncertainty to the situation and opens a potential space for
policymakers and higher education institutions (HEIs) to navigate. We
draw on interviews and documents collected from four HEIs during this
reform interval. We analyse and discuss how the four institutions
navigate, coordinate, mobilise, copy, and learn in a situation without a
formal national EQA system in place but in which the wider higher
education policy context is deeply infused with contemporary trends and
international policies and ideas on quality assurance (QA). We found
that context and institutional preconditions set their mark on the work
undertaken during this interval. We also discerned tendencies of
homogenisation and isomorphism. Finally, we highlight the tendency of
further expansion of EQA activities.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Last updated on 2022-07-04 at 16:12