B2 Vertaisarvioimaton kirjan tai muun kokoomateoksen osa

Challenges in Legal Argumentation: A Swedish-Finnish Perspective




TekijätJohanna Niemi

ToimittajaMattias Dahlberg

KustannuspaikkaUppsala

Julkaisuvuosi2019

Kokoomateoksen nimiLaw and society: Contributions by the Honorary Doctors

Sarjan nimiDe Lege - Juridiska Fakulteten i Uppsala Årsbok

Numero sarjassa2018

Aloitussivu227

Lopetussivu248

ISBN978-91-7737-025-3

ISSN1102-3317

Verkko-osoitehttps://iustus.se/litteratur/de-lege-2018-law-and-society/

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/41356095


Tiivistelmä

Comparison of legal argumentation in two closely related legal systems can help to understand legal reasoning in both of them and even generally. This article compares the patterns of legal argumentation and the use of sources of law in Swedish and Finnish jurisprudence. It argues that Swedish jurisprudence was until recently influenced by the inheritance of the Scandinavian realism whereas the Finnish legal thought has been permeated by somewhat formalistic school of rational legal argumentation. The quest for justice that young researchers in particular are interested in has challenge both traditions.  Fundamental rights, legal principles, social constructionist theory and discourse analytical have enriched legal research.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 10:34