Refereed article in conference proceedings (A4)

Cryptographic key generation using ECG signal




List of AuthorsMoosavi Sanaz Rahimi, Nigussie Ethiopia, Virtanen Seppo, Isoaho Jouni

Conference nameIEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC)

PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

Publication year2017

Journal name in source2017 14th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, CCNC 2017

Title of seriesIEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC)

Start page1024

End page1031

Number of pages8

ISBN978-1-5090-6197-6

eISBN978-1-5090-6196-9

ISSN2331-9860

DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CCNC.2017.7983280


Abstract

n this paper, two different electrocardiogram (ECG) based cryptographic key generation approaches are proposed. The aim is to enhance the security of body area networks through robust key generation where keys are generated on the fly without requiring key pre-distribution solutions. The Interpulse Interval (IPI) feature of ECG underlays both of the proposed approaches. The first approach is realized by using a pseudo-random number and consecutive IPI sequences. The second approach is realized by utilizing the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) algorithm and IPI as the seed generator for the AES algorithm. The efficiency of the proposed approaches is evaluated using real ECG data of 15 patients obtained from the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia dataset of PhysioBank. The security analyses of the generated keys are carried out in terms of distinctiveness, randomness, and temporal variance as well as using the NIST benchmark. The analyses show that our key generation approaches provide a higher security level in comparison to existing approaches relying only on singleton IPI sequences. The execution times required to generate the cryptographic keys on different processors are also examined. The results reveal that the security level improvement comes with a reasonable increase in key generation execution time. Comparing to existing IPI-based approaches, our approaches require 12.3% and 41.2% more execution time, respectively.


Last updated on 2021-24-06 at 08:51